401K Central    
  Home
  Commentary
  Tips
  Education
  Tools
  Library
IRA Central    
  Home
  Commentary
  Tips
  Education
  Library

Ted's Table

Dec. 19, 2000

This Week, Ted Tackles:

How does an "individual deferred annuity" differ from an IRA or a 401(k)? ... Is the 22 percent fee charged by the person who set up my employer's 401(k) plan reasonable? ... I'm worried that my wife's former employer will keep her 401(k) money. What should I do?


Technical Terms
Annuity

Fiduciary

Rollover

Question: How does an "individual deferred annuity" differ from an IRA or a 401(k)?

TB: The biggest difference is the fact that all deposits into an individual deferred annuity are taxed prior to going into the plan. With a 401(k) or traditional IRA, you may generally make contributions before paying tax on the money. (Income limits for deductible contributions to a traditional IRA apply to people who participate in a 401(k) plan.)

For example, let's assume you earn $50,000 a year, are at the 28 percent tax rate and want to contribute 6 percent of pay to your retirement. Your 401(k) contribution will be deducted from your paycheck prior to paying federal income tax — you can contribute $3,000 into the plan without having to pay income tax on it first. With an individual deferred annuity, however, in order to contribute $3,000 you actually have to start with $4,167 of gross pay, which is reduced to $3,000 after paying income taxes.

When you consider the impact of contributing to a 401(k) plan on your take-home pay, you get more mileage out of your money. Again, using a 28 percent tax rate, suppose you contribute $3,000 to a 401(k) plan. The after-tax impact on that contribution is only $2,160, the other $840 is collected by the government in income tax.

Other differences include the following:

  1. It is easier to take money out of an individual deferred annuity than a 401(k); and
  2. Individual deferred annuities typically have higher expenses than 401(k) investments.
One thing that is the same among all these vehicles is that investment income is tax-deferred until it is withdrawn.

The major issues to consider when comparing these alternatives are your goals. Pretax contributions to a 401(k) or IRA are more advantageous if you are investing money for retirement. An individual deferred annuity should be considered for amounts you want to invest in excess of the amount you can contribute to your 401(k) or IRA.

Question: I've worked at the same place for about 10 years. Last year, my boss had a friend set up a 401(k) plan with a mutual fund company. I was very happy with the plan then. This year, I noticed something that is upsetting me. The man who set up the plan is taking a large chunk of my contributions (22 percent) in the form of "trustee fees."

He took a set fee in the first quarter and again in the third quarter of this year. For two of my co-workers, his fees are so large that he has actually taken out more this year than they have put in.

This man is not involved in administering or managing the plan. I selected my own funds; my weekly contributions are held in a bank in town and then our bookkeeper sends them to the fund company each quarter. I spoke to my boss but he does not believe that his friend is abusing us. I understand that this man deserves to make a living but this sounds excessive.

Is there any way that I can keep the funds (they have done well) and lose the man or is there some way that I can force him to lower his fees? Despite my initial excitement about being able to participate in a 401(k), I see little sense in continuing it this way. Any additional information you can give me on this would be greatly appreciated.

TB: This arrangement is quite unusual and, as you describe it, it is also abusive. There are much better alternatives, and your employer has a fiduciary responsibility to act solely in the best interest of the participants. For example, there are ways of structuring the plan so that 100 percent of your money is invested into the applicable funds and the only fee you would pay is the fund investment management fee.

The Department of Labor (DOL) is responsible for administering this area of the law. It is permissible to pass all administrative fees to the plan but the fees must be reasonable. The DOL has been auditing employers to determine whether expenses paid by participants meet this standard. I don't think your employer would make out very well if the plan was audited by the DOL.

As a way to convince your boss of the potential gravity of this situation, you may feel free to give my comments to him — and I hope they might be as compelling as anything you can say.

By the way, holding the money in a local bank account for six months may also be a problem, unless the account in which it is held is a plan account with a trustee rather than a company or personal account.

Question: My wife has a 401(k) plan with a law firm where she was previously employed two years ago. The firm is of questionable ethics; I'm worried the money might "disappear" or be churned to extinction or even directed to some offbeat investment such as the firm's office real estate investments. My wife claims the funds are federally protected and there is "legal recourse." I say get the money out, through a rollover, and have it managed out in the open. What should we do?

Related Reading
Avoid Penalties with a 401(k) Rollover

Your Guide to Understanding 401(k) Plan Fees

The ABCs of Annuities

TB: I agree with your recommendation. It does not make sense to leave money in a former employer's plan if you are not satisfied with the investments and/or you do not trust those who run the plan. Your wife should have the money transferred directly into an IRA. I also recommend contacting the Department of Labor's Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration office closest to you if she has any difficulty getting the money transferred to her IRA.



Ted Benna, creator of the first 401(k) retirement savings plan, will answer your most intriguing questions every week. With over 30 years of experience as an employee benefits consultant, Ted is a nationally recognized expert on benefits issues. He has authored two books, Helping Employees Achieve Retirement Income Security and Escaping the Coming Retirement Crisis, and is President of the 401(k) Association. Ted is a frequent speaker at meetings of 401(k) plan sponsors and participants. His articles and comments have appeared in numerous publications, including The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal.


The information provided here is intended to help you understand the general issue and does not constitute any tax, investment or legal advice. Consult your financial, tax or legal advisor regarding your own unique situation and your company's benefits representative for rules specific to your plan.
401Kafe.com is the premier online community resource for 401(k) participants


Copyright © 1996 - 2000 mPower. All Rights Reserved.
401K Central    
  Home
  Commentary
  Tips
  Education
  Tools
  Library
IRA Central    
  Home
  Commentary
  Tips
  Education
  Library

Ted's Table

Dec. 19, 2000

This Week, Ted Tackles:

How does an "individual deferred annuity" differ from an IRA or a 401(k)? ... Is the 22 percent fee charged by the person who set up my employer's 401(k) plan reasonable? ... I'm worried that my wife's former employer will keep her 401(k) money. What should I do?


Technical Terms
Annuity

Fiduciary

Rollover

Question: How does an "individual deferred annuity" differ from an IRA or a 401(k)?

TB: The biggest difference is the fact that all deposits into an individual deferred annuity are taxed prior to going into the plan. With a 401(k) or traditional IRA, you may generally make contributions before paying tax on the money. (Income limits for deductible contributions to a traditional IRA apply to people who participate in a 401(k) plan.)

For example, let's assume you earn $50,000 a year, are at the 28 percent tax rate and want to contribute 6 percent of pay to your retirement. Your 401(k) contribution will be deducted from your paycheck prior to paying federal income tax — you can contribute $3,000 into the plan without having to pay income tax on it first. With an individual deferred annuity, however, in order to contribute $3,000 you actually have to start with $4,167 of gross pay, which is reduced to $3,000 after paying income taxes.

When you consider the impact of contributing to a 401(k) plan on your take-home pay, you get more mileage out of your money. Again, using a 28 percent tax rate, suppose you contribute $3,000 to a 401(k) plan. The after-tax impact on that contribution is only $2,160, the other $840 is collected by the government in income tax.

Other differences include the following:

  1. It is easier to take money out of an individual deferred annuity than a 401(k); and
  2. Individual deferred annuities typically have higher expenses than 401(k) investments.
One thing that is the same among all these vehicles is that investment income is tax-deferred until it is withdrawn.

The major issues to consider when comparing these alternatives are your goals. Pretax contributions to a 401(k) or IRA are more advantageous if you are investing money for retirement. An individual deferred annuity should be considered for amounts you want to invest in excess of the amount you can contribute to your 401(k) or IRA.

Question: I've worked at the same place for about 10 years. Last year, my boss had a friend set up a 401(k) plan with a mutual fund company. I was very happy with the plan then. This year, I noticed something that is upsetting me. The man who set up the plan is taking a large chunk of my contributions (22 percent) in the form of "trustee fees."

He took a set fee in the first quarter and again in the third quarter of this year. For two of my co-workers, his fees are so large that he has actually taken out more this year than they have put in.

This man is not involved in administering or managing the plan. I selected my own funds; my weekly contributions are held in a bank in town and then our bookkeeper sends them to the fund company each quarter. I spoke to my boss but he does not believe that his friend is abusing us. I understand that this man deserves to make a living but this sounds excessive.

Is there any way that I can keep the funds (they have done well) and lose the man or is there some way that I can force him to lower his fees? Despite my initial excitement about being able to participate in a 401(k), I see little sense in continuing it this way. Any additional information you can give me on this would be greatly appreciated.

TB: This arrangement is quite unusual and, as you describe it, it is also abusive. There are much better alternatives, and your employer has a fiduciary responsibility to act solely in the best interest of the participants. For example, there are ways of structuring the plan so that 100 percent of your money is invested into the applicable funds and the only fee you would pay is the fund investment management fee.

The Department of Labor (DOL) is responsible for administering this area of the law. It is permissible to pass all administrative fees to the plan but the fees must be reasonable. The DOL has been auditing employers to determine whether expenses paid by participants meet this standard. I don't think your employer would make out very well if the plan was audited by the DOL.

As a way to convince your boss of the potential gravity of this situation, you may feel free to give my comments to him — and I hope they might be as compelling as anything you can say.

By the way, holding the money in a local bank account for six months may also be a problem, unless the account in which it is held is a plan account with a trustee rather than a company or personal account.

Question: My wife has a 401(k) plan with a law firm where she was previously employed two years ago. The firm is of questionable ethics; I'm worried the money might "disappear" or be churned to extinction or even directed to some offbeat investment such as the firm's office real estate investments. My wife claims the funds are federally protected and there is "legal recourse." I say get the money out, through a rollover, and have it managed out in the open. What should we do?

Related Reading
Avoid Penalties with a 401(k) Rollover

Your Guide to Understanding 401(k) Plan Fees

The ABCs of Annuities

TB: I agree with your recommendation. It does not make sense to leave money in a former employer's plan if you are not satisfied with the investments and/or you do not trust those who run the plan. Your wife should have the money transferred directly into an IRA. I also recommend contacting the Department of Labor's Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration office closest to you if she has any difficulty getting the money transferred to her IRA.



Ted Benna, creator of the first 401(k) retirement savings plan, will answer your most intriguing questions every week. With over 30 years of experience as an employee benefits consultant, Ted is a nationally recognized expert on benefits issues. He has authored two books, Helping Employees Achieve Retirement Income Security and Escaping the Coming Retirement Crisis, and is President of the 401(k) Association. Ted is a frequent speaker at meetings of 401(k) plan sponsors and participants. His articles and comments have appeared in numerous publications, including The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal.


The information provided here is intended to help you understand the general issue and does not constitute any tax, investment or legal advice. Consult your financial, tax or legal advisor regarding your own unique situation and your company's benefits representative for rules specific to your plan.
401Kafe.com is the premier online community resource for 401(k) participants


Copyright © 1996 - 2000 mPower. All Rights Reserved.